Before turning to the topics of gunk, junk and dense chains of parthood below, we will now first clarify what it is for an answer to the special composition question to be purely mereological and what we take it for such an answer to be philosophically satisfying.Ī purely mereological answer to the special composition question does not take recourse to anything but mereological structure. As we will argue, many members of this family are both philosophically satisfying and compatible with gunky objects, the world being junky and dense chains of parthood. The aim of this paper is to contribute to this debate by arguing against extant proposals in the literature and exploring a novel family of purely mereological answers to the special composition question. This result has ignited a discussion about weaker rules in the vicinity that are compatible with the world being junky. being such that every object is a proper part. However, it has been shown in the recent literature (Bohn 2009a, b Cotnoir 2014) that this candidate-answer has the feature that it is incompatible with the world being junky, i.e. Footnote 1 A prominent candidate-answer to the special composition question consists in the rule of Strong Unrestricted Composition that says that every plurality of objects has a fusion. When does a plurality of objects compose an object? Most philosophers believe that one can answer this special composition question by pointing to certain rules of composition – rules that provide necessary and jointly sufficient conditions for when some objects compose an object, a fusion of them. As we will show, all the instances for infinite \(\kappa \)s determine fusion and are compatible with junk, and every instance for a \(\kappa > \aleph _0\) is furthermore compatible with gunk and dense chains of parthood. We will then go on to explore an alternative family of purely mereological rules in the vicinity of Weak Unrestricted Composition, Cardinal Composition: A plurality of pairwise non-overlapping objects composes an object iff the objects in the plurality are of cardinality smaller than \(\kappa \). However, neither Weak Unrestricted Composition alone nor the different variants of it that have been proposed in the literature can provide us with a satisfying answer to the special composition question, or so we will argue. This thesis has been argued by Contessa (Analysis 72(3):455–457, 2012) and Smith (Erkenntnis 84(1):41–55, 2019) to be compatible with the world being junky and hence to evade an argument against the necessity of Strong Unrestricted Composition proposed by Bohn (Analysis 69(1):27–31, 2009a, Philos Q 59(235):193–201, 2009b). This is one of the “new product launch” type of cases.The thesis of Weak Unrestricted Composition says that every pair of objects has a fusion. Their questions to us are: Should they introduce this new product in the market? If yes, how? If not, why not? Our consulting firm has been retained to evaluate the market potential for this product. Recently researchers at Cardinal Health have just invented a new product for non-invasive surgical procedures. The company is also a major manufacturer of medical and surgical products, including gloves, surgical apparel and fluid management products. Cardinal Health specializes in health care supply chain services, providing pharmaceuticals and medical products to more than 40,000 locations each day. (NYSE: CAH) is a Fortune 500 health care services and medical devices company based in Dublin, Ohio, United States. Industry Coverage: healthcare: hospital & medical.Ĭase Interview Question #00494: Our client, Cardinal Health, Inc. Consulting Firm: Putnam Associates 2nd round job interview.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |